AI: Artificial Intelligence DRIVE: Drive Auto Receivables Trust, a securitization platform
Standard wording or passing mentionDetail: GeneralNew this year
SNUS-PH, SNUS-PI · MA · Large bank ($50B and above)
Total assets of FDIC-insured bank subsidiaries: $104.1B at the end of 2025
Filings on the SEC website · This bank on Bankgraph
| Report year | Using or planning AI | Explains how AI is controlled | Sees AI as a risk | Other mentions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | ||||
| 2022 | ||||
| 2022 | ||||
| 2022 | ||||
| 2023 | ||||
| 2023 | ||||
| 2023 | ||||
| 2023 | ||||
| 2024 | ||||
| 2024 | ||||
| 2024 | ||||
| 2024 | ||||
| 2025 | ||||
| 2025 | ||||
| 2025 | ||||
| 2025 |
| In the 2025 report | This bank | Banks of its size |
|---|---|---|
| Using AI now | Yes | 12 of 43 (28%) |
| Explains how AI is controlled | Yes | 30 of 43 (70%) |
| Sees AI as a risk | Yes | 43 of 43 (100%) |
| Mentions generative AI | Yes | 33 of 43 (77%) |
| Mentions AI agents | No | 10 of 43 (23%) |
8 passages new in the 2025 report, 3 passages from the 2024 report no longer there.
AI: Artificial Intelligence DRIVE: Drive Auto Receivables Trust, a securitization platform
•We use AI, which could expose us to certain risks. We utilize AI and continue to explore additional uses of AI in connection with our businesses, products and services. However, AI solutions, such as those provided by third parties, may expose us to risks including, without limitation, inadequacies in the AI service that results in false or misleading information, operational inefficiencies, legal liability, reputational harm and other adverse impacts.
New competitors may enter the market or existing competitors may adjust their services with unique product or service offerings or approaches to providing banking services. If we are unable to compete successfully with current and new competitors, or if we are unable to anticipate and adapt our offerings to changing banking industry trends, including technological changes, our business may be adversely affected. In addition, our failure to anticipate or adapt to emerging technologies or changes in customer behavior effectively, including among younger customers, could delay or prevent our access to new digital-based markets, which would in turn have an adverse effect on our competitive position and business. Furthermore, the widespread adoption of new technologies, including distributed ledger, artificial intelligence, and/or biometrics, to provide services such as cryptocurrencies and payments, could require substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our existing products and services as we continue to grow our internet and mobile banking capabilities. Our customers may choose to conduct business or offer products in areas that may be considered speculative or risky. Such new technologies and the rise in customer use of internet and mobile banking platforms in recent years could negatively impact the value of our investments in bank premises, equipment and personnel for our branch network. The persistence or acceleration of this shift in demand towards internet and mobile banking may necessitate changes to our retail distribution strategy, which may include closing and/or selling certain branches and restructuring our remaining branches and workforce. These actions could lead to losses on these assets and increased expenditures to renovate, reconfigure or close a number of our remaining branches or otherwise reform our retail distribution channel. Furthermore, our failure to keep pace with innovation or to swiftly and effectively implement such changes to our distribution strategy could have an adverse effect on our competitive position.
We use AI, which could expose us to liability or adversely affect our business.
We utilize, and continue to explore additional uses of, AI in connection with our business, products and services, including AI designed to improve the customer experience and reduce operational risk.
However, there are significant risks involved in utilizing AI, and no assurance can be provided that our use will enhance our products or services or produce the intended results. For example, AI models may be flawed, trained on insufficient or poor-quality data, reflect unwanted forms of bias or contain other errors or inadequacies, any of which may not be easily detectable. AI solutions (including those supplied by third parties) may produce false, inaccurate, misleading, biased or otherwise deficient inferences or outputs, rely on data, technology or intellectual property to which we or any of our contractors, vendors or service providers lack rights, or be subject to new documentation, transparency, governance and validation expectations. Strengthening controls to address these risks—such as human oversight, testing and independent model validation—may increase costs and affect time-to-market, and any errors or inadequacies in AI systems used for control functions (such as transaction monitoring or sanctions screening) could lead to operational disruptions, compliance failures, regulatory scrutiny, reputational harm, fines or penalties. AI may subject us to new or heightened legal, regulatory, ethical, operational, reputational or other challenges, and AI may involve inappropriate or controversial data practices by developers and end-users, or other factors adversely affecting public opinion of AI, any of which could impair the acceptance of AI solutions. We also depend on third-party models, datasets and infrastructure; outages, and changes in functionality or terms or concentration in a limited number of providers could disrupt our operations or increase costs.
If the AI solutions we create or use are deficient, inaccurate or controversial, we could incur operational inefficiencies, competitive harm, legal liability, brand or reputational harm, or other adverse impacts on our business and financial results. There can be no assurance that our use of AI will be successful in reducing our operational risk or increasing our operational efficiencies or otherwise result in our intended outcomes.
Additionally, the use of AI solutions by companies has resulted in and may continue to result in cyberattacks, data breaches, data losses and other security incidents that implicate the proprietary, confidential, sensitive and personal data of AI users. For example, if any of our employees, contractors, vendors, service providers or other third parties with which we do business use any third-party AI-powered solutions in connection with our business, it may lead to the inadvertent disclosure or incorporation of our proprietary, confidential, sensitive or personal data into third-party systems or publicly available or third-party training sets (including so-called 'data leakage'), which may impact our ability to realize the benefits of our intellectual property or proprietary, confidential, sensitive or personal data, harming our competitive position and business. If we do not have sufficient rights to use the data or other material or content on which our AI solutions or other AI tools we use rely, we also may incur liability through the violation of applicable laws and regulations, third-party intellectual property, privacy or other rights, or contracts to which we are a party (including third-party claims of intellectual property infringement, misappropriation or other violation or other misuse of data, content or technology, regulatory enforcement actions and contractual remedies). Further, the use of AI solutions within products or services that we use or that are used by our contractors, vendors, service providers or other third parties with which we do business may pose similar risks, and we have limited ability to control the manner in which third-party products are developed or maintained or the manner in which third-party services are provided.
Advances in AI, including generative AI, may also be used by threat actors to facilitate cyber attacks, including the creation of highly convincing phishing and social-engineering campaigns, automated malware development, deepfake-enabled fraud, reconnaissance and vulnerability discovery, and the rapid scaling and customization of attacks across multiple targets. The evolving nature of these threats empowered by AI increases the threat landscape and complexity and heightens cybersecurity, operational, and financial risk.
AI: Artificial Intelligence DPD: days past due
•We utilize AI, which could expose us to liability or otherwise adversely affect our business.
New competitors may enter the market or existing competitors may adjust their services with unique product or service offerings or approaches to providing banking services. If we are unable to compete successfully with current and new competitors, or if we are unable to anticipate and adapt our offerings to changing banking industry trends, including technological changes, our business may be adversely affected. In addition, our failure to anticipate or adapt to emerging technologies or changes in customer behavior effectively, including among younger customers, could delay or prevent our access to new digital-based markets, which would in turn have an adverse effect on our competitive position and business. Furthermore, the widespread adoption of new technologies, including distributed ledger, artificial intelligence, and/or biometrics, to provide services such as cryptocurrencies and payments, could require substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our existing products and services as we continue to grow our internet and mobile banking capabilities. Our customers may choose to conduct business or offer products in areas that may be considered speculative or risky. Such new technologies and the rise in customer use of internet and mobile banking platforms in recent years could negatively impact the value of our investments in bank premises, equipment and personnel for our branch network. The persistence or acceleration of this shift in demand towards internet and mobile banking may necessitate changes to our retail distribution strategy, which may include closing and/or selling certain branches and restructuring our remaining branches and workforce. These actions could lead to losses on these assets and increased expenditures to renovate, reconfigure or close a number of our remaining branches or otherwise reform our retail distribution channel. Furthermore, our failure to keep pace with innovation or to swiftly and effectively implement such changes to our distribution strategy could have an adverse effect on our competitive position.
Risks Associated with Our Use of AI
We utilize, and are continuing to explore further uses of, AI in connection with our businesses, products and services. However, regulation of AI is evolving rapidly as legislators and regulators are increasingly focused on these emerging technologies. The technologies underlying AI and its uses are subject to a variety of laws and regulations, including intellectual property, privacy, data protection and information security, consumer protection, competition, and equal opportunity laws, and are expected to be subject to increased regulation and new laws or applications of existing laws and regulations. AI is the subject of ongoing review by various U.S. governmental and regulatory agencies, and various U.S. states are applying, or are considering applying, their cybersecurity and data protection laws and regulations to AI, or are considering legal frameworks for AI.
We may not be able to anticipate how to respond to these rapidly evolving laws and regulations, and we may need to expend resources to adjust our offerings in certain jurisdictions if the legal and regulatory frameworks are inconsistent across jurisdictions. Furthermore, because AI technology itself is highly complex and developing rapidly, it is not possible to predict all of the legal or regulatory risks that may arise related to the use of AI. If laws and regulations relating to AI are implemented, interpreted or applied in a manner inconsistent with our current practices or policies, those laws and regulations may adversely affect our use of AI and our ability to provide and improve our services, require additional compliance measures and changes to our operations and processes and result in increased compliance costs and potential increases in civil claims against us, any of which could adversely affect our operating results, financial condition and prospects.
New competitors may enter the market or existing competitors may adjust their services with unique product or service offerings or approaches to providing banking services. If we are unable to compete successfully with current and new competitors, or if we are unable to anticipate and adapt our offerings to changing banking industry trends, including technological changes, our business may be adversely affected. In addition, our failure to anticipate or adapt to emerging technologies or changes in customer behavior effectively, including among younger customers, could delay or prevent our access to new digital-based markets, which would in turn have an adverse effect on our competitive position and business. Furthermore, the widespread adoption of new technologies, including distributed ledger, artificial intelligence, and/or biometrics, to provide services such as cryptocurrencies and payments, could require substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our existing products and services as we continue to grow our internet and mobile banking capabilities. Our customers may choose to conduct business or offer products in areas that may be considered speculative or risky. Such new technologies and the rise in customer use of internet and mobile banking platforms in recent years could negatively impact the value of our investments in bank premises, equipment and personnel for our branch network. The persistence or acceleration of this shift in demand towards internet and mobile banking may necessitate changes to our retail distribution strategy, which may include closing and/or selling certain branches and restructuring our remaining branches and workforce. These actions could lead to losses on these assets and increased expenditures to renovate, reconfigure or close a number of our remaining branches or otherwise reform our retail distribution channel. Furthermore, our failure to keep pace with innovation or to swiftly and effectively implement such changes to our distribution strategy could have an adverse effect on our competitive position.
New competitors may enter the market or existing competitors may adjust their services with unique product or service offerings or approaches to providing banking services. If we are unable to compete successfully with current and new competitors, or if we are unable to anticipate and adapt our offerings to changing banking industry trends, including technological changes, our business may be adversely affected. In addition, our failure to anticipate or adapt to emerging technologies or changes in customer behavior effectively, including among younger customers, could delay or prevent our access to new digital-based markets, which would in turn have an adverse effect on our competitive position and business. Furthermore, the widespread adoption of new technologies, including distributed ledger, artificial intelligence, and/or biometrics, to provide services such as cryptocurrencies and payments, could require substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our existing products and services as we continue to grow our internet and mobile banking capabilities. Our customers may choose to conduct business or offer products in areas that may be considered speculative or risky. Such new technologies and the rise in customer use of internet and mobile banking platforms in recent years could negatively impact the value of our investments in bank premises, equipment and personnel for our branch network. The persistence or acceleration of this shift in demand towards internet and mobile banking may necessitate changes to our retail distribution strategy, which may include closing and/or selling certain branches and restructuring our remaining branches and workforce. These actions could lead to losses on these assets and increased expenditures to renovate, reconfigure or close a number of our remaining branches or otherwise reform our retail distribution channel. Furthermore, our failure to keep pace with innovation or to swiftly and effectively implement such changes to our distribution strategy could have an adverse effect on our competitive position.